Akhilesh's pre-poll free laptops up for sale | ||
| ANANYA SENGUPTA | ||
New Delhi, June 6: Students in Uttar Pradesh have turned pre-election freebies into neat profit-making ventures by selling them in the open market. On Monday, Uttar Pradesh chief minister Akhilesh Yadav had distributed over 8,000 free laptops to first-year students of select government colleges in Ghaziabad and Noida, in what was seen as jumpstarting the campaign for the 2014 general elections. Akhilesh had then said the laptops "would help students in this age of competition". However, many students rushed to the market within hours of getting the laptops, approaching shopkeepers with offers to sell them, said sources. The Telegraph managed to convince two students, one of whom had sold his laptop, and another who had attempted to do so, to explain why they took the freebie to the open market. "I already have a laptop, so didn't need this one. I sold mine for Rs 7,000 to a senior on the very day I got it," said a first-year student. Another student, who had decided to wait for a better price, said she wasn't well-off to afford an Internet connection. "It would have been great if the laptops had come with an Internet connection as well. I cannot afford to install one and also pay the Internet bills," she said Computer dealers and spare parts shop owners at Noida's Atta Market confirmed they had been approached by students to sell the laptops that were given to them by the government. "You know as soon as you power on the computer that it's a government freebie as the chief minister and his father stare back at you from the screen. Some students came to me with the laptop and asked me to buy one for Rs 5,000. I didn't buy it, but asked them to keep one at the shop so that I could take a look at its configuration," said a shopkeeper at Atta Market. The HP laptops were bought by the Uttar Pradesh government for Rs 19,058 a piece. Owners and employees of electronic goods showroom told this newspaper the laptops distributed by the chief minister was the best in this price range. With the same specifications, a Dell laptop would cost around Rs 23,000 and one from Sony would be around Rs 29,000. "Yes, we were told today that the laptops that Akhileshji distributed had been sold by some students. We are very saddened by this because the idea behind giving the laptops was to bridge the gap between urban and rural students. We wanted them to read and study by using the laptops. It wasn't for making profit," said Anurag Dixit, the national secretary of Akhilesh's Samajwadi Party. "However, once we have given the laptops, it's the property of the students. What they do with it, we can't control. I think the mindsets of both students and parents need to change, no amount of policing can help. However, the administration has taken notice of this, and hopefully this will not happen again," said Dixit, who was present at the programme on May 3 when the laptops were distributed by the chief minister. While the authorities of the colleges in which the laptops were distributed refused to come on record about their students' money-making ventures, they said an inquiry has been ordered and students have been asked to bring back the laptops to their colleges for inspection. |
Friday, June 7, 2013
Akhilesh’s pre-poll free laptops up for sale
Bunny & lady long legs
Honey, we ain’t bet-fellows Charges fly at Raj & Shilpa
Honey, we ain't bet-fellows | |
| IMRAN AHMED SIDDIQUI | |
New Delhi, June 6: Delhi police today claimed that Rajasthan Royals co-owner Raj Kundra had admitted to betting on IPL matches for the past three seasons but clarified that there were no spot-fixing charges against him so far. They said Kundra's business partner, friend and alleged bookie Umesh Goenka had claimed that Kundra's wife Shilpa Shetty too had placed a lone bet during this year's IPL — an allegation the actress has denied on Twitter. (See chart) Officers acknowledged that Kundra's purported confession during Wednesday's police questioning was inadmissible in court as it had not been made before a magistrate. However, Goenka's statement implicating both Kundra and Shilpa was recorded in a Delhi court on Tuesday, which means it could become a matter of his word against the couple's. An officer said a conviction for gambling or betting is possible only if the police can establish in court that they caught the accused red-handed while placing a bet and produce the seized cash, or at least furnish incriminating phone call details and trace the money trail. "It's difficult to seek conviction just on the basis of somebody's statement," he said, adding that betting was a relatively "minor offence" and the police were focused on the more serious charge of spot-fixing brought against three Royals cricketers and 23 bookies. However, the development will have put the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) in a fix on a day it would have been celebrating India's win in their Champions Trophy opener against South Africa. (See Sport) Any proof of betting against Kundra will necessitate the immediate termination of the franchise, which will bring the fate of the Chennai Super Kings into question too. Gurunath Meiyappan, arrested and bailed on the charge of betting, is associated with the Super Kings although team officials claim he was just a cricket "enthusiast". Meiyappan is the son-in-law of N. Srinivasan, who has "stepped aside" as BCCI president. In Calcutta, Jagmohan Dalmiya, who heads the interim arrangement in the board, said the Kundra issue would be discussed at the BCCI's scheduled emergency working committee meeting in New Delhi on June 10. Clause 12.3 of the IPL franchise agreements lists circumstances under which the BCCI "may terminate this agreement with immediate effect by written notice". Sub-clause (c) under this clause spells out one of these circumstances: "The franchisee, any franchisee group company and/or any owner acts in any way which has a material adverse effect upon the reputation or standing of the League, BCCI-IPL, BCCI, the franchisee, the team (or any other team in the league) and/or the game of cricket…." S.N. Srivastava, special commissioner (special cell), told The Telegraph the police had seized the passport of Kundra, a British citizen. "Raj Kundra confessed to having placed bets on his team and other teams…. He told us he had been betting for the past three years and claimed to have lost Rs 1 crore," Srivastava said. Police sources said Shilpa too could be called for questioning but not before next week "as we have to verify several other things". Srivastava said the police had sought details of the bank accounts of Kundra and Shilpa to probe any possible link to spot-fixing. If none were found, they would be booked under the Public Gambling Act of 1867, which prescribes a maximum punishment of three months or a fine not exceeding Rs 200, an officer said. "We can book Kundra and his wife for gambling (based on Goenka's statement) straightaway but don't want to do so. Our focus is not on betting, a bailable offence," an officer said. "We want to focus on the 23 arrested bookies' links with Dawood Ibrahim's crime syndicate and on whether Kundra had any such connection." The officer joked that if the police began nabbing people on gambling charges, the number of arrests would rise to 2,600 from the current 26. Goenka had been called for questioning on Tuesday after Royals cricketer Sidharth Trivedi said before a magistrate that Kundra's friend had asked him for pitch and team details before a match, sources said. Kundra was summoned the next day and confronted with Goenka, who had told the police that he placed bets on Kundra's behalf, they added. Kundra, one of four Royals owners, acquired 11.7 per cent stakes in the team three years ago. "He began betting on cricket soon after taking over," an officer alleged. http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130607/jsp/frontpage/story_16981163.jsp#.UbHtCNKBlA0 |
Anti chit fund Bill: Centre has sought clarifications, did not return Bill- Mamata
|
स्वायत्तता के बहाने
| Thursday, 06 June 2013 09:52 |
हरिपाल दास इस प्रसंग में विजिटर के कार्यालय की दीर्घसूत्रता पर भी विचार किया जाना चाहिए। उनके पास पिछले छह महीने से इस संदर्भ में चिट्ठियां जा रही हैं। उनका जवाब तो देना दूर, उस कार्यालय ने इतना भी जरूरी नहीं समझा कि वह उनकी पावती दे। कहा जा सकता है कि विजिटर तो आखिरकार मंत्रालय के माध्यम से काम करता है। वह मंत्रालय की सलाह के बिना कुछ भी कैसे बोलता? और इस सरकार की आम किंकर्तव्यविमूढ़ता की बीमारी का शिकार मंत्रालय हाथ बांधे बैठा रहा। तो विजिटर कैसे बोलते? इस सच्चाई को जानते सब हैं, फिर किस स्वायत्तता का ढोंग किया जा रहा है? सुनते हैं, प्रधानमंत्री ने बड़ी मासूमियत से पूछा कि वे कैसे एक स्वायत्त संस्था के काम में दखल दें? फिर उतने ही निश्छल भाव से उन्होंने जानना चाहा कि आखिर विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग क्यों कुछ नहीं करता! वे शायद कहना चाहते थे कि आयोग भी सरकार से स्वतंत्र है। उनकी इस सादगी पर कुर्बान होने को जी चाहता है। क्या वे भूल गए कि आयोग के अध्यक्ष के चयन में प्रधानमंत्री कार्यालय की क्या भूमिका थी? कि किस तरह उन्होंने खुद आयोग के अध्यक्ष की खोज के लिए बनी चयन समिति के प्रस्ताव को खारिज किया और उस समिति को कहा था कि वह अपनी सूची में और नाम डाले? क्या यह सच नहीं कि उक्त चयन समिति को बाध्य होकर वे नाम भी डालने पड़े जिन्हें पहले उसने योग्य नहीं पाया था? और क्या यह सच नहीं कि पहली बार चयन समिति की अंतिम सूची से खारिज कर दिए गए व्यक्तियों में से ही एक, आज आयोग के अध्यक्ष हैं? जब विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग जैसी महत्त्वपूर्ण संस्था के प्रमुख के चयन में इस प्रकार का सीधा हस्तक्षेप निस्संकोच किया जाता है और वह भी ऐसे व्यक्ति के पक्ष में, जिसके बारे में सरकार के नौकरशाहों का खयाल है कि उनके साथ काम करना सबसे आसान है, तब स्वायत्तता एक सुविधाजनक आड़ के अलावा और कुछ नहीं रह जाती। वह स्वेच्छाचारी निष्क्रियता के लिए एक सुंदर तर्क है। दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय के नए स्नातक कार्यक्रम की निगरानी के लिए बनी समिति फिर भी एक अवसर है। अध्यापकों, अभिभावकों, छात्रों के लिए। इस समिति को खुद भी नए पाठ्यक्रम का अध्ययन करना चाहिए और दूसरे विशेषज्ञों की भी राय लेनी चाहिए। हम क्या उम्मीद करें कि यह समिति स्वतंत्र रूप से, बौद्धिक साहस के साथ काम करेगी और किसी गैर-अकादमिक, तकनीकी तर्क से अस्वीकार्य को स्वीकार्य बनाने के लिए कोई बहाना नहीं खोजेगी? पिछले वर्षों में हमने अनेक बार बौद्धिकों का इस्तेमाल सरकार द्वारा अपने कृत्यों को जायज ठहराने के लिए होते देखा है। इस बार फिर इसका खतरा है। इस निगरानी समिति के गठन के ही दिन मीडिया से बात करते हुए आयोग के अध्यक्ष ने समिति के कार्य के बारे में एक ऐसी बात कही है जो आयोग की अधिसूचना में कहीं नहीं है। उन्होंने एक अंग्रेजी दैनिक से कहा कि यह समिति अन्य विश्वविद्यालयों के लिए इस चार साला पाठ्यक्रम की उपयुक्तता पर भी विचार करेगी। समिति के काम शुरू करने के पहले ही वे इसके लिए निर्धारित काम से अलग अनौपचारिक इशारे कर रहे हैं। स्थापित प्रक्रियाओं को किनारे करके अनौपचारिक तरीकों से काम निकाल लेने की प्रवृत्ति इस सरकार की खासियत बन गई है। आयोग इस सरकारियत का शिकार हो तो हैरानी क्यों हो! लेकिन आयोग के अध्यक्ष के इस इशारे को नजरअंदाज करना खतरनाक होगा। विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग के बोर्ड की अगली बैठक में यह सवाल जरूर पूछा जाना चाहिए कि क्यों इस विषय पर बोर्ड को विचार करने का अवसर नहीं दिया गया? यह एक मौका भी हो सकता है कि सांस्थानिक प्रक्रियाओं को फिर से बहाल किया जाए। इसकी जितनी सख्त जरूरत दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय को है उतनी ही विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग और इस सरकार को भी। |
दिल्ली वाया उत्तर प्रदेश
दिल्ली वाया उत्तर प्रदेश
|
कमाई में धोनी ने नडाल, शारापोवा और बोल्ट को पीछे छोड़ा
कमाई में धोनी ने नडाल, शारापोवा और बोल्ट को पीछे छोड़ा
|