Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter

PalahBiswas On Unique Identity No1.mpg

Unique Identity Number2

Please send the LINK to your Addresslist and send me every update, event, development,documents and FEEDBACK . just mail to palashbiswaskl@gmail.com

Website templates

Zia clarifies his timing of declaration of independence

What Mujib Said

Jyoti Basu is dead

Dr.BR Ambedkar

Memories of Another day

Memories of Another day
While my Parents Pulin babu and Basanti Devi were living

Monday, June 27, 2011

Fwd: [Right to Education] Why DU fixes upper limit of the % while...



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vijay Kumar <notification+kr4marbae4mn@facebookmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:18 PM
Subject: [Right to Education] Why DU fixes upper limit of the % while...
To: Right to Education <167844673250090@groups.facebook.com>


Why DU fixes upper limit of the % while announcing cut-off marks. if a child gets 65.2% marks and the cut-off % for a programme e.g. Tourism is 64-65%, then he/she wont be able to take admission in this programme. why DU do this? why not DU fixes lower limit only? if a child gets more marks, then, will it hamper his studies or college reputation in any way? This should be changed by DU! after all, a major student friendly change has been incorporated by DU this year by facilitating Walk-in-admission.
Vijay Kumar 7:18pm Jun 27
Why DU fixes upper limit of the % while announcing cut-off marks. if a child gets 65.2% marks and the cut-off % for a programme e.g. Tourism is 64-65%, then he/she wont be able to take admission in this programme. why DU do this? why not DU fixes lower limit only? if a child gets more marks, then, will it hamper his studies or college reputation in any way? This should be changed by DU! after all, a major student friendly change has been incorporated by DU this year by facilitating Walk-in-admission.

View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.



--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

No comments: