Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter

PalahBiswas On Unique Identity No1.mpg

Unique Identity Number2

Please send the LINK to your Addresslist and send me every update, event, development,documents and FEEDBACK . just mail to palashbiswaskl@gmail.com

Website templates

Zia clarifies his timing of declaration of independence

What Mujib Said

Jyoti Basu is dead

Dr.BR Ambedkar

Memories of Another day

Memories of Another day
While my Parents Pulin babu and Basanti Devi were living

Friday, August 28, 2009

Parivar at war looks at Sangh

Thus, Works the MANUSMRITI Nation Colonised by ZIONIST ImperialismCORPORATE!Pranab slams attempts to vilify Nehru on Partition!SAFFRON Parivar at war looks at Sangh.Kalam, Chidambaram rebut claim that '98 H-bomb test was dud!Govt clears 3G; auctions by Nov!Govt eyes $200 bn export; doles out sops!BJP has to decide its own future: RSS chief

 

 Troubled galaxy Destroyed Dreams, Chapter 353

 

Palash Biswas

 

 


Pl visit:

http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/


  1. News results for Mohan Bhagwat


    Indian Express
    Rajnath meets RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat‎ - 18 hours ago
    New Delhi, Aug 27 (PTI) BJP President Rajnath Singh today met RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat and is understood to have discussed the escalating internal squabbles ...
    Press Trust of India - 333 related articles »
  2. Mohan Bhagwat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Mohan Madhukar Bhagawat is the sixth Sarsanghachalak of Rashtriya Swayamsevak ... Sarakaryavaha of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh Mohan Bhagwat [has said][3]. ...
    Life - Education - Association with RSS - works
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohan_Bhagwat - Cached - Similar -
  3. Mohan Bhagwat: A vet and RSS pracharak for over 30 years - India ...

    21 Mar 2009 ... NEW DELHI: Mohan Bhagwat, a 58-year-old veterinary doctor, is one of the youngest to head the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). ...
    timesofindia.indiatimes.com/.../Mohan-Bhagwat.../4296920.cms - Cached - Similar -
  4. About Mohan Bhagwat Ji | Hindu Sangam 2006 Tri-State

    16 Sep 2006 ... Shri Mohan ji Bhagwat hails from a small town called Chandrpur in Maharashtra. A veterinary doctor by education, Mohanji dedicated himself ...
    www.hssus.org/HinduSangamNJ/?q=about-mohan-bhagwat... - Cached - Similar -
  5. Image results for Mohan Bhagwat

     - Report imagesReport the following images as offensive. Confirm CancelThank you for the feedback.
    http://www.hssus.org/gallery/v/WCOAST/Bayarea/DSC_0354.jpg.htmlhttp://www.topnews.in/regions/maharashtra?page=7http://topics.ibnlive.com/rss.htmlhttp://ready2beat.com/educational/biography-mohan-bhagwat-new-rss-chiefhttp://www.hssus.org/gallery/v/WCOAST/Bayarea/DSC_0354.jpg.html
  6. Video results for Mohan Bhagwat

  7. RSS names Mohan Bhagwat its new chief: 'pragmatist' & friend of Advani

    22 Mar 2009 ... Ending speculation that there would be no change in the RSS setup, Mohan Bhagwat was appointed the sixth RSS chief on Saturday after K.S. ...
    www.indianexpress.com/...mohan-bhagwat.../437505/ - Cached - Similar -
  8. New chief Mohan Bhagwat will forge ties with like-minded groups ...

    21 Mar 2009 ... Taking the cadres by complete surprise, the RSS chief KS Sudarshan on Saturday announced his retirement and anointed Dr Mohan Bhagwat as his ...
    www.dnaindia.com/.../report_new-chief-mohan-bhagwat-will-forge-ties-with-like-minded-groups_1241188 - Cached - Similar -
  9. Rajnath meets RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat; discusses turmoil in BJP ...

    27 Aug 2009 ... BJP President Rajnath Singh on Thursday met RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat and is understood to have discussed the escalating internal squabbles ...
    www.hindustantimes.com/...Mohan-Bhagwat.../H1-Article3-447733.aspx - 17 hours ago - Similar -
  10. Mohan Bhagwat - Pipl Profile

    Pipl profile of Mohan Bhagwat. Quick facts, personal profiles, publications, contact details and much more.
    pipl.com/directory/people/Mohan/Bhagwat - Cached - Similar -
  11. Rajnath Singh meets Mohan Bhagwat to discuss BJP crisis

    1 post - 1 author - Last post: 11 hours ago
    New Delhi, Aug 27 (IANS) Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) president Rajnath Singh met Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat here ...
    www.thaindian.com/.../rajnath-singh-meets-mohan-bhagwat-to-discuss-bjp-crisis_100239133.html - 18 hours ago - Similar -
  12. The Hindu : National : BJP reads clear message from Mohan Bhagwat

    20 Aug 2009 ... NEW DELHI: Loud and clear messages from Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat to the Bharatiya Janata Party a day before the start ...
    www.thehindu.com/2009/08/20/.../2009082056931000.htm - Cached - Similar -
  13. Blog posts about Mohan Bhagwat

You have removed results from this search. Hide them
Loading...


12345678910Next


BJP has to decide its own future: RSS chief



Mangalorean.com - ‎6 minutes ago‎

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat,
in a rare press conference, said: "We are not worried (about the
goings-on in the BJP) and it is immaterial whether the Sangh is ...













BJP must look for younger successor to Advani: RSS



Times of India - ‎Aug 18, 2009‎

( Watch Video ) RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat broke his silence in an exclusive and wide-ranging interview to Times Now editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami. ...






RSS distances itself from Jaswant sack



Times of India - ‎Aug 21, 2009‎

JAMMU: RSS sarsanghachalak Mohan Bhagwat on Friday brushed aside all questions relating to the expulsion of senior BJP leader Jaswant Singh from the party ...






A severe identity crisis



Express Buzz - ‎Aug 25, 2009‎

Mohan Bhagwat was
politically correct all through his interview to Times Now, making
suggestions to the BJP yet emphasising that it was the party's internal
...








Mess in party may delay Modi's national debut



Daily News & Analysis - ‎14 hours ago‎

Despite his good equations with RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat the Sangh might find it difficult to bring him into the national arena for a few years," said a BJP ...













LK, RSS chief meet ahead of baithak



Times of India - ‎Aug 12, 2009‎

NEW DELHI: Did RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat suggest to LK Advani that he should give some thought to his successor? Advani has sharply denied media reports to ...






Lashkar threat for Azad, Bhagwat



Times of India - ‎Aug 12, 2009‎

PTI 12 August 2009, 10:32pm IST
NEW DELHI: With intelligence agencies giving inputs that Union Health
Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat ...






`I have not read Jaswant Singh's book,' says Bhagwat



Thaindian.com - ‎9 minutes ago‎

New Delhi, Aug.28 (ANI): Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Mohan Bhagwat said on Friday that he was yet to read expelled BJP leader Jaswant Singh's latest ...










The selection and placement of stories on this page were determined automatically by a c
  1. BANGLAPEDIA: Mukherji, Shyama Prasad

    Mukherji, Shyama Prasad (1901-1953) scholar, Hindu nationalist and parliamentarian. Shyama Prasad Mukherji was born on 6 July 1901 in a Brahmin family of a ...
    banglapedia.search.com.bd/HT/M_0365.htm - Cached - Similar -
  2. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Indian Politician

    Shayama Prasad Mukherjee was born on 6th July 1901in a Brahmin family of a high Shyama Prasad Mukherjee social status, to Sir Ashutosh Mukherjee, ...
    www.indianetzone.com/6/shyama_prasad_mukherjee.htm - Cached - Similar -
  3. Image results for Shyama Prasad Mukherjee

     - Report imagesReport the following images as offensive. Confirm CancelThank you for the feedback.
    http://www.timescontent.com/tss/showcase/preview-buy/15732/News/Shyama-Prasad-Mukherjee--Dr-S-Radhakrishnan.htmlhttp://www.mohsinshaikh.com/website/images/portrait/pages/photo72.htmhttp://www.indianetzone.com/6/shyama_prasad_mukherjee.htmhttp://pib.nic.in/archieve/phtgalry/pgyr2001/pg072001/pg06jul2001/06072001.htmlhttp://www.raipurcity.info/places/chowks.php
  4. College Details - University of Delhi

    Shyama Prasad Mukherjee
    College. Address, : (For Women) Punjabi Bagh (West), Road No. 57, New
    Delhi-110026. Phone, : 25224499, 25225598. Fax, : 25221672 ...
    www.du.ac.in/collegedetails.htm?...Shyama+Prasad+Mukherjee... - Cached - Similar -
  5. Great Indians : Greatmen : Noted Indian personalities ...

    Shyamaprasad Mukherjee was born of illustrious parents on 6th July 1901. His father was Sir Ashutosh Mukherjee the noted educationist and mother Jogomaya ...
    www.bangalinet.com/greatmen_shyamaprasad.htm - Cached - Similar -
  6. Shyama Prasad Mukherji College for Women - Delhi University INDIA

    Shyama Prasad Mukherji College is a well known women's college of ... Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherji always held education and its cause close to his heart. ...
    www.spmcollegedu.com/ - Cached - Similar -
  7. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee College

    Shyama Prasad Mukherjee College in Delhi offers various courses ranging from undergraduate and postgraduate programs to several professional courses.
    www.indiaedu.com/.../shyama-prasad-mukherjee-college.html - Cached - Similar -
  8. SHYAMA PRASAD MUKHERJEE

    Postal Stamp Name, : SHYAMA PRASAD MUKHERJEE. Stamp Information, : Born at Calcutta on 6 July 1901, Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee inherited a rich tradition of ...
    www.indianpost.com/.../SHYAMA%20PRASAD%20MUKHERJEE - Cached - Similar -
  9. HRDG CSIR

    To commemorate the birth centenary year (2000) of Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, who was the first Vice-President of CSIR in the Independent India, ...
    csirhrdg.res.in/spm1.htm - Cached - Similar -
  10. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee

    A selection of articles related to Shyama Prasad Mukherjee.
    www.experiencefestival.com/shyama_prasad_mukherjee - Cached - Similar -
  11. Timeline results for Shyama Prasad Mukherjee

    1951
    In 1951, when Shyama Prasad Mukherjee resigned from the Nehru Cabinet, he was seeking to form a political party. The RSS chief then sent pracharaks ...
    pd.cpim.org
    1953
    In 1953, Dr Shyama Prasad Mukherjee was arrested in Srinagar while agitating for Hindu rights in Kashmir, and died under "mysterious circumstances ...
    desicritics.org
    More timeline results »
Searches related to: Shyama Prasad Mukherjee
shyama prasad mukherjee collegedr shyama prasad mukherjee
You have removed results from this search. Hide them
Loading...















A tale of two brothers
Maybe
it was in her upbringing. Joan Robinson’s father was, after all, a
general in the British army during World War I. She had always a
no-nonsense approach to life and things, and could not suffer fools.
She could not suffer foolish ideas either. ...  | Read.. 
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090828/jsp/opinion/index.jsp







Battle of two cultures rages in BJP


Party looks up to
RSS boss for clues

































New Delhi, Aug. 27:
The BJP leadership’s reluctance to act against Arun Shourie is being
seen as a manifestation of the turf war raging within the larger Sangh
parivar.





Many leaders fear this tussle will throw up uglier episodes of internal bickering.





The
broad assessment of a large number of leaders is that the current
crisis will go a long way in shaping the party’s future politics.





“This
may be viewed as a larger battle between two cultures; one that wants
to dilute the ideological position and intends to turn the BJP into
another Congress, and the other that seeks salvation through
strengthening the ideology,” a senior leader told The Telegraph. “In other words, between television poster boys and ideologically grounded leaders.”





In
fact, Shourie’s case — coming close on the heels of the abrupt
expulsion of Jaswant Singh — is a curious example of the leadership’s
double standard.





Shourie
has so far not shown any sense of remorse. On the contrary, he has
scaled up his attack on L.K. Advani and Arun Jaitley by using
derogatory metaphors like dead horses. But the party has not acted
against him, exposing the vertical split among top leaders who are busy
weighing the damages caused to individuals rather than the party’s
image.





While
one section feels BJP chief Rajnath Singh is not worried about the
crumbling edifice because he is itching to dance on the political
graves of a few rival leaders, another section argues the fight is
against those who are bent on destroying the party’s unique identity.





Those
not attached to different factions are praying for normality to return
soon as the party, they fear, may not survive if the strife carries on
for long.





What
has been worrying many party members more than these unending
controversies is the perception that there is no unity of purpose among
senior leaders who are supposed to restore normality.





These
members now look up to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat
to set the house in order and that’s why his news conference tomorrow
is being awaited with great interest.





The RSS had withdrawn its representative Suresh Soni from the Shimla chintan baithak earlier this month but now some BJP leaders expect Bhagwat to make a more definitive intervention.





But
Sangh sources say Bhagwat’s news conference is part of an old schedule
in which he spends three days at a place, sparing a day each for swayamsevaks, intellectuals and the media. Similar programmes have already been held in Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Jammu and Kashmir.





The
BJP leaders, however, point out that Bhagwat’s regular interaction with
the media is linked to the RSS desire to mount pressure on the party
leadership which is resisting change despite total disarray.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090828/jsp/nation/story_11419256.jsp







Vedic churn in Bengal politics


Singur critics on thin ice, a chance for CM

























Calcutta,
Aug. 27: The Vedic Village episode has quietly begun to churn Bengal
politics, exposing players in the CPM, the Trinamul Congress and the
real estate business behind the questionable land acquisition in the
area.





The
arson at the resort and its aftermath, though, has had an unusual
political fallout so far. Ever ready to catch the CPM and Buddhadeb
Bhattacharjee on the wrong foot, Mamata Banerjee has been inexplicably
silent on the issue. Neither she nor her party has demanded a CBI
inquiry into the incident or used it to attack the chief minister.





The
chief minister, too, has been silent, but political circles point out
that his position was stated by the home secretary, Ardhendu Sen, who
blamed the land mafia for the eruption of violence at Vedic Village.





But
the silence in the two rival political camps barely conceals the hectic
attempts to pass the buck and cover up the tussles within.





Publicly,
though, both sides have denied any association with the main accused,
Gaffar Mollah. Credible reports are now emerging that he was definitely
a Trinamul activist with close links to the party leadership. Trinamul
sources said Mamata was upset about the exposure of Gaffar’s political
loyalties.





Trinamul’s
core committee, which met in Calcutta today, discussed the Vedic
Village incident and asked party activists not to be associated with
the illegal land deals in the area, said Mukul Roy, Union minister of
state for shipping and a close Mamata aide.





Party
leaders admitted that Gaffar was also close to Trinamul’s Bhangar MLA
Arabul Islam and his brother, Khude Islam. A party leader suggested
that Arabul could be served with a show-cause notice.





But
the story of Gaffar’s politics does not end with Trinamul. Not long
ago, he was said to have been close to the CPM, particularly to land
and land reforms minister Abdur Rezzak Mollah, an MLA from neighbouring
Canning.





Mollah,
who has been very vocal recently in his criticism of the chief minister
over the land-for-industry policy, has been curiously silent on the
issue. But sources indicated that the incident had added a new
dimension to the tussle between the two.





Sources
close to the chief minister said he might be tempted to use the
incident to stage a comeback, adding that the home secretary’s
statements should be read in that context.





The
resort attack has also brought another factor into play: the critics of
the government’s Singur policy within and outside the government have
been caught on the wrong foot –- a development that cannot displease
the chief minister.





Bhattacharjee
and his supporters in the party would like to use it to call Mollah’s
bluff over the land issue and cut him to size.





Mollah
is one of the aspirants for a slot in the party’s powerful state
secretariat and some see him as a chief ministerial hopeful. His
detractors could use the Vedic land controversy to scuttle his chances
for upward mobility in the party.





Publicly,
however, CPM sources close to Mollah denied any role for him in the
land deals in Rajarhat. The party has only highlighted Gaffar’s links
with Trinamul.





The
housing minister and a state secretariat member, Gautam Deb, and the
party MLA from Rajarhat, Rabin Mondal, denied any knowledge of Gaffar’s
links with the party.





But
Deb suggested that inquiries should be made into the “mysterious” land
transfers taking place around Vedic Village. “What would they do with
around 1,500 acres? Run a resort?”





All
he would say was that the industries department and subsequently the IT
department had asked for land to set up an IT hub and an industrial
park.





But
he had no idea as to how the vested land was given to the promoters or
later how land was being purchased by promoters on behalf of the
government.





“Ask
Rezzak-da or Nirupam-da (the industries minister) about it,” Deb added.
“If the issue comes up to BRDA (Bhangar-Rajarhat Development
Authority), we won’t give them the NOC (no-objection certificate).”





Legal rights of patta land are known to be not very precise and are practically owned by whoever physically occupy them.





Deb’s
attempts to skirt responsibility would surprise CPM activists and the
common people in the area. Not only is he a powerful party leader from
North 24-Parganas district, the BRDA is under his ministry.





The
CPM’s uneasiness about the episode is largely because of the
involvement of its leaders and workers with land promoters. Kamal
Gandhi, associated with the promoters of Vedic Village, has long been
close to several party leaders, especially those close to Jyoti Basu.
But then, he and other promoters have their patrons in Trinamul as
well.





CPM
state secretary Biman Bose -- who on the face of it appeared perturbed
but, like the chief minister, is unlikely to be unhappy with the turn
of events -- today asked the government to deal with the wrongdoers
“sternly”.





“The
administration has to be stern in handling the situation there and
inquire who took what role and also what they had done earlier. It is
another matter if somebody purchased land by paying the price,” Bose
said.





He,
however, dodged a question on the demand of allies like the RSP and the
CPI that the Vedic Village promoters be arrested after weapons were
found from a labour hutment.





Bose,
who had attended a North 24-Parganas meeting yesterday, said he has
sought a report from the district leadership and would seek a similar
one from the South 24-Parganas leadership also as the promoters’
alleged coercive land purchase drive covered both districts.






However, he parried a question on whether he would seek a report from
land minister Mollah for leasing out vested land to the Vedic Village
promoters in an out-of-court settlement or IT minister Debesh Das for
entering into a deal with the same promoters to procure land for an IT
park. “I can’t reply without knowing the details,” Bose said.





Another
party state secretariat member, Shyamal Chakraborty, denied any shady
land dealings between the Village promoters and the government. But he
came down heavily on police. “What were the police doing before the
violence erupted?”





Konar
said the police should arrest the Village promoters. “The owners can’t
escape their responsibilities for claiming ignorance of the illegal
arms stockpile. If my son hides such weapon at my home without my
knowledge, the police won’t spare me,” Konar said.





Konar tried to score a political point over Trinamul Congress chief Mamata Banerjee.





“Such
an ugly situation would not have been created if there was no direct
purchase of land by private players which inevitably leads to the
involvement of touts and toughs. But Mamata resisted government
acquisition and advocated the direct purchase for narrow political
benefit,” Konar said.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090828/jsp/frontpage/story_11419723.jsp

Syama Prasad Mookerjee



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Jump to: navigation, search




























Syama Prasad Mookerjee




Born6 July 1901(1901-07-06)

Kolkata in Bengal
Died23 June 1953 (aged 51)
Political partyBharatiya Jana Sangh
ReligionHindu

Syama Prasad Mookerjee (or Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Bengali: শ্যামাপ্রসাদ মুখোপাধ্যায়) (July 6, 1901 - June 23, 1953) was a nationalist political leader of India, and is considered the godfather of modern Hindutva and Hindu Nationalism.


Mookerjee founded the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the first Hindu nationalist political party of its kind, and was also the leader of the Hindu Mahasabha and closely associated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.










Contents


[hide]





[edit] Early life


Mookerjee was born on July 6, 1901 in Calcutta [now Kolkata], the capital of British India. His father was Sir Ashutosh Mukherjee, a well respected advocate in Bengal, who became the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Calcutta, and his mother was Lady Jogmaya Devi Mookerjee.


Mookerjee obtained his degrees from the University of Calcutta.
He graduated in English securing the first position in first class in
1921 and also did MA in 1923 and BL in 1924. He became a fellow of the
Senate in 1923. He enrolled as an advocate in Calcutta High Court in 1924 after his father's death. Subsequently he left for England in 1926 to study in Lincoln's Inn
and became a barrister in 1927. At the age of 33, he became the
youngest Vice-Chancellor of the University of Calcutta (1934), and held
the office till 1938.



[edit] Political career


He was elected as member of the Legislative Council of Bengal, as an Indian National Congress
candidate representing Calcutta University but resigned next year when
Congress decided to boycott the legislature. Subsequently, he contested
the election as an independent candidate and got elected. He was the
Finance minister of Bengal Province during 1941-42.


He emerged as a spokesman for Hindus and shortly joined Hindu Mahasabha
and in 1944, he became the President. Mookerjee was political leader
who felt the need to counteract the communalist and separatist Muslim League of Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who were demanding either exaggerated Muslim rights or a Muslim state of Pakistan.


Mookerjee adopted causes to protect Hindus against what he believed
to be the communal propaganda and the divisive agenda of the Muslim League.
Mookerjee and his future followers would always cite inherent Hindu
practices of tolerance and communal respect as the reason for a
healthy, prosperous and safe Muslim population in the country in the first place.


Mookerjee was initially a strong opponent of the Partition of India,
but following the communal riots of 1946-47, Mookerjee strongly
disfavored Hindus continuing to live in a Muslim-dominated state and
under a government controlled by the Muslim League.


On 11 February 1941 S P Mookerjee told a Hindu rally that if Muslims
wanted to live in Pakistan they should "pack their bag and baggage and
leave India... (to) wherever they like".[1]


A no-confidence motion was moved in the Bengal Legislative Assembly
after the Calcutta killings of 1946. In the debate that followed he
again made a memorable speech, lambasting Suhrawardy and his cohorts
for their open incitement to mass murder, at the same time emphasizing
the irresponsible self-centeredness exhibited by the resident Whites
(then called Europeans) of the city. Excerpts from his speech :


"Mr. Speaker Sir, since yesterday we have been discussing the motion
of no-confidence under circumstances which perhaps have no parallel in
the deliberations of any Legislature in any part of the civilised
world. What happened in Calcutta is perhaps without a parallel in
modern history. St. Bartholomew's Day of which history records some
grim events of murder and butchery pales into insignificance compared
to the brutalities that were committed in the streets, lanes and
bye-lanes of this first city of British India. . . . . let me say this
that what had happened was not the result of a sudden explosion, but it
is the culmination of an administration, corrupt, inefficient and
communal which has disfigured the life of this great province. But so
far as the immediate cause is concerned . . . . it is said on behalf of
the Muslim League that the Cabinet Mission proved faithless to Muslim
interests and thereby created a situation which had no parallel in the
Anglo-Muslim relationship in the country. What did actually the Cabinet
Mission do? The Muslim League, the spoilt and pampered child of the
British Imperialists for the last thirty years, was disowned for the
first time by the British Labour Government . . . . (Loud noise from
the Government benches) . . . . When Mr. Jinnah was confronted at press
conference in Bombay on the 31st July and was asked whether direct
action meant violence or non-violence, his cryptic reply was 'I am not
going to discuss ethics'. (The Hon. Mr. Mohammed Ali : Good.). But
Khwaja Nazimuddin was not so good. He came out very bluntly in Bengal
and said that Muslims did not believe in non-violence at all. Now Sir,
speeches like these were made by responsible League leaders. . . . All
this was followed by a series of articles and statements which appeared
in the columns of Newspapers -- the Morning News, the Star of India and
the Azad. If . . . my friend Mr. Ispahani . . . . reads these documents
. . . he will be able to find out that there was nothing but open and
direct incitement to violence. Hatred of Hindus and jehad on the Hindus
was declared was declared in fire-eating language . . . and the general
Moslem public have acted according to the instructions. . . . . Sir,
there is one point I would like to say with regard to the Britishers in
this house. My friends are remaining neutral. I cannot understand this
attitude at all. If the Ministry was right (then) support them, and if
the Ministry was wrong you should say so boldly and not remain neutral.
Merely sitting on the fence shows signs of abject impotence.
(Laughter). My friend Mr. Gladding (a leader of the European group in
the house) says luckily none of his people were injured. It is true
Sir, but that is a statement that makes me extremely sorry. If a single
Britisher, man, or woman, or a child had been struck, they would have
thrown the Ministry out of office without hesitation but because no
Britisher was touched they can take an impartial and neutral view! . .
. . . It is therefore vitally necessary that this false and foolish
idea of Pakistan or Islamic rule has to be banished for ever from your
head. In Bengal we have got to live together."




Mookerjee supported the partition of Bengal in 1946 to prevent the inclusion of its Hindu-majority areas in a Muslim-dominated East Pakistan; he also opposed a failed bid for a united but independent Bengal made in 1947 by Sarat Bose, the brother of Subhas Chandra Bose and Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy, a Bengali Muslim politician.


He wanted the Hindu Mahasabha not to be restricted to Hindus alone or work as apolitical body for the service of masses. Following the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi
by a Hindu fanatic, the Mahasabha was blamed chiefly for the heinous
act and became deeply unpopular. Mookerjee himself condemned the murder
and left the party.



[edit] Post-independence


Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru
inducted him in the Interim Central Government as a Minister for
Industry and Supply. Mookerjee was widely respected by many Indians and
also by members of the Indian National Congress, and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, one of its chief leaders.


But on issue of the 1949 Delhi Pact with Pakistani Prime Minister Liaqat Ali Khan,
Mookerjee resigned from the Cabinet on April 6, 1950. Mookerjee was
firmly against Nehru's invitation to the Pakistani PM, and their joint
pact to establish minority commissions and guarantee minority rights in
both countries. He wanted to hold Pakistan directly responsible for the
terrible influx of millions of Hindu refugees from East Pakistan, who
had left the state fearing religious suppression and violence aided by
the state. Mookerjee considered Nehru's actions as appeasement, and was
hailed as a hero by the people of West Bengal.[citation needed]


After consultation with Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar, leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Mookerjee founded the Jan Sangh (Indian People's Union) on October 21, 1951 at Delhi and became its first President.


The BJS criticized favoritism to India's Muslims by the Nehru administration, and promoted free-market economics as opposed to the socialism
in Nehru's economic and social policies. The BJS also favored a uniform
civil code for both Hindus and Muslims, want to ban cow slaughter and
end the special status of Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir. The BJS founded the Hindutva
agenda which became the wider political expression of India's Hindu
majority. He was instrumental in establishing Hindu Line within the
Congress.


In the 1952 general elections to the Parliament of India, Mookerjee and the BJS won three seats.


Sri Mookerjee opposed the Indian National Congress's decision to allow Kashmir to be a special state and have its own flag and prime minister. According to Congress's decision, no one, including the President of India can enter into Kashmir without Kashmir's prime minister permission.


In order to oppose this decision, he once said "Ek desh mein do Vidhan, do Pradhan and Do Nishan nahi challenge" (A single country can't have two constitutions, two prime ministers, and two National Emblems).


Mookerjee went to visit Kashmir in 1953, and went on hunger strike
to protest the law prohibiting Indian citizens from settling in a state
in their own country and the need to carry ID cards, and was arrested
on 11 May while crossing border. Although the ID card rule was revoked
owing to his efforts, he died as detenu on June 23, 1953 under
mysterious circumstances. Shyama Prasad was jailed in a dilapidated
house, where his health deteriorated. He was administered penicillin
though he informed the doctor-in-charge that he was allergic to
penicillin. During illness, it was his death in custody raised wide
suspicion across the country and demands for independent enquiry,
including earnest requests from his mother, Jogmaya Devi to the then
Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru. Unfortunately the then
Government of India declared that his death was a natural one, and
there was no need to set up any enquiry commission. Consequently, his
death remains a mystery.[2]



[edit] Legacy


Along with Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Mookerjee is considered the godfather of Hindu nationalism in India, especially the Hindutva movement. He is widely revered by members and supporters of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad.


Mookerjee was a major role model to Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who made the BJS the chief Hindu conservative political party in the 1960s and 1970s, and founded its successor, the Bharatiya Janata Party. The BJP has become one of the two largest national political parties, the other being the Indian National Congress Party, and had formed the Government from 1998 to 2004, with Vajpayee serving as the Prime Minister of India.


On August 27, 1998, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (governed by the BJP) named a bridge after Mookerjee. [1]


A junction near the Chhatrapati Shivaji Museum ( formerly the Prince
of Wales Museum ) and Regal Cinema in Mumbai is named after him.


In 2001, the main research funding institute of the Government of India , CSIR [2]
instituted a new fellowship named after him. The Shyama Prasad Mukhejee
Fellowship is the most prestigious fellowship given in India for doing
PhD. Only the top 20% students who clear the Junior Research Fellowship
(JRF CSIR/UGC) are eligible to sit for this examination.



[edit] References



  1. ^
    [Legislative Council Proceedings [BLCP], 1941, Vol. LIX, No. 6, p
    216].Legislative Council Proceedings [BLCP], 1941, Vol. LIX, No. 6, p
    216
  2. ^ "http://www.rediff.com/news/2009/mar/27guest-column-tarun-vijay-on-dynasty-and-the-varun-effect.htm"



[edit] External links




[edit] See also


1. Legislative Council Proceedings [BLCP], 1941, Vol. LIX, No. 6, p 216


2. Suranjam Das Communal Riots in Bengal 1905 - 1947; Oxford University Press, 1991



 

Govt eyes $200 bn export; doles out sops!

 


Govt clears 3G; auctions by Nov!


 


Govt mulls stake sale along with IPO in SAIL!

Thanks Hindutva! Thanks RSS! Thanks Congress!Pranab slams attempts to vilify Nehru on Partition! India's Finance Minister Pranab
Mukherjee has said attempts were being made to vilify Pandit
Jawaharlal Nehru in the wake of Jaswant Singh's book on
Mohammad Ali Jinnah and said it was a malicious campaign to
distort history for narrow partisan interests.

He also attacked attempts to make out that Shyama
Prasad Mukherjee, the leader of the Hindu Mahasabha, the
progenitor of the latter day Jana Sangh and Bharatiya Janata
Party (BJP), and Jinnah had no role in Partition.

Mukherjee made sarcastic references to senior BJP
leader L K Advani's controversial visit to Pakistan in 2005
and Jaswant Singh's book on Jinnah and said they should
explain the psychology behind glorifying Jinnah.

"BJP leaders should explain. When Advani will go to
Pakistan, he will discover that Jinnah is secular. Jaswant
Singh suddenly discovered that he was not responsible (for
Partition). He wanted a united India.


The RSS, the ideological parent of the BJP said,
“We are not worried (about the goings-on in the BJP) and it is immaterial
whether the Sangh is happy or not happy about it.”



Referring to
his recent suggestion to TV channel Times Now that a younger leadership take
over the reins of the BJP, Bhagwat said: "Fifty to sixty years is the average
age for the Sangh leadership and it's for the political party to decide what
should be the right age for it."



He also said the RSS will not
comment on the Kandahar episode.



Two crucial functionaries of the NDA
government, Brajesh Mishra, close aide to Atal Bihari Vajpayee and national
security advisor, and Yashwant Sinha had joined expelled leader Jaswant Singh
and George Fernandes on Thursday in insisting that L K Advani was party to the
decision to swap three terrorists for hostages on board IA flight IC-814.



Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat on Friday said the
organisation would make all out efforts for the construction of a Ram
temple in Ayodhya.


"The Sangh was, is and will remain committed to the construction of the
Ram mandir (temple) in Ayodhya and will do its best possible for it,"
Bhagwat told reporters here.


Bhagwat maintained that Muslims were not against the temple. "It may be
your belief that they are against (construction of the temple)... but
not ours...."


He also said the acceptability of the Sangh, the ideological parent of the BJP, had improved over the years.


"Sangh's popularity has increased and even those considered against us,
welcome us wherever we go. They may not agree with our ideology, but
otherwise they have cordial relations with us," the RSS chief said in a
rare press conference.


On Dec 6, 1992 the 16th century monument, Babri Masjid, was razed by
Hindu zealots allegedly associated to the Sangh Pariwar-which the RSS
heads-which claims that the mosque was constructed at the birth place
of Hindu god Ram where there used to be a temple.







The Centre has sanctioned Rs 20 crore for
the renovation of two memorials to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel in his home
state Gujarat at a time a debate is raging on his legacy.


Sardar
Patel Memorial Trust in Ahmedabad will get Rs 17 crore and the Sardar
Vallabhbhai Patel Memorial in Anand Rs 3 crore. The grants have been
made even as requests for similar funding by other trusts are pending.






“It
may be true the decision coincides with a controversy but our grant is
a normal procedural one,” a culture ministry official said. The
Ahmedabad trust had sought Sonia Gandhi’s help last year.



I have been writing on the Proactive Role of Bengali Brahmin leaders in Partition of India as they did never wan to share power with the CONVERTED Untouchables Black!

The AXIS of PoSt Modern Manusmriti Zionist Apartheid Triiblis SATANIC Order COLONY, the Elite KEERNAHAR Brahmin PRANAB Mukherjee, at last, EMERGED in OPEN to defend NEHRU PATEL Gandhi BRAHAMINCAL Nexus killing ABORIGINAL,INDIGENOUS Minorty Communities in the Sub Continent for Ever!

Pranab admits, CONFESSES before the ALTER that it was SHYAMA PRASAD Mukherjee, the Bengali RSS Man, who had been RESPONSIBLE for the partition of PUNJAB as well as BENGAL!

With the fires in BJP still raging
over the debate on the roles of Mohammed Ali Jinnah, Jawaharlal Nehru
and Sardar Patel during Partition, senior Congress leader and Finance
Minister Pranab Mukherjee today sought to turn the tables by reminding
the BJP of Jan Sangh founder Syama Prasad Mookerjee’s support to the
Partition plan.


Speaking at the
Idea Exchange programme of The Indian Express, Mukherjee said Mookerjee
had not only welcomed the Partition plan prepared in June 1947 but was
also instrumental in the division of Bengal and Punjab by demanding
that the principle of religious majority to decide an area’s inclusion
in India or Pakistan be extended from provinces to the districts as
well.


“That is how
Bengal and Punjab got divided. This is how the Sylhet district in
undivided Assam went to Pakistan, now Bangladesh,” Mukherjee said. “Now
if they (BJP) want to forget their own legacy, only God can help them,”
he said.


Mukherjee also took a dig at the BJP
for the party’s obsession with Jinnah. He said he was also completely
clueless as to why the BJP was so “deeply engaged” with Jinnah’s legacy
as the issue had no relevance in contemporary Indian politics — not at
least for political parties to evaluate his place in history.


He did not,
however, shy away from giving his own take on Pakistan’s founder. “I
cannot ignore this fact that he was a great protagonist of the
two-nation theory. But I have great faith in his commitment which he
made as Governor General of Pakistan that in Pakistan, all religious
minorities will be protected,” Mukherjee said.



Pranab has to Defend the UNTRUTH for which Gandhi Experimented so much!

Pranab Has to Defend the UNHOLY ENSLAVEMENT Infinite dueto Power Transfer UNLAWFUL!

He has not to say anything on the PLIGHT of the Bengali dalits suffering Permanent EXODUS, HOLOCAUST and Persecution! He has not to defend the CITIZENSHIP Amendment Act followed by Countrywide DEPORTATION Drive to Benefit REALTY Sector and India Inc, the LPG mafia.

Vedic Vilage EPISODE has EXPOSED very well the ANTI RURAL reole of the RULING Hegemony ofVarious Political COLOR in Bengal.

 But Generation Next knows nothing about the MISCHIEF of NC Chatterjee, SHYAMAPRASAD Mukherjee and HINDU Mahasabha as well as CONGRESS ledby Sharat Basu and BC Roy.

 PRANAB SURFACED with a part of HIDDEN ICE Berg to defend the ZIONIST Dynasty Ruling Colonised India as his ANCESTORS were INDULGED to do all the manipulations to support Gandhi and Eject out Netaji Subhash Chandra Basu out of India to INJECT blood in alienated Muslim League.

 It was Gandhi who betrayed Dalits with Harijan Tour and Poona Pact.

It was Gandhi who called for Ram Rajya.

And once again, it was Gandhi who dragged tourkey and KHILAFAT in India to appease Muslims in India.

JINNAH was opposed to all these NONSENSE!

 Thanks, the WarringFactions open the FLOOD Gates of Forgotten past!



BJP has to decide its own future: RSS chief

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has to "think and decide" its own
future, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat said in
New Delhi on Friday while stressing that the ideal age for the
leadership of the Sangh Parivar it heads was "50 to 60 years".



RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, in a rare press conference, said: "We are
not worried (about the goings-on in the BJP) and it is immaterial
whether the Sangh is happy or not happy about it; the BJP has to think
and decide its future."



The RSS, the ideological parent of the BJP, said the ongoing crisis
in the party did not worry it and it was the BJP's internal matter.


Referring to his recent suggestion that a younger leadership take
over the reins of the BJP, Bhagwat said: "Fifty to sixty years is the
average age for the Sangh leadership and it's for the political party
to decide what should be the right age for it."



In what was seen as a reference to the 82-year-old BJP leader LK
Advani, Bhagwat had said in a recent interview to a television channel
that there was need for a younger leadership to take charge of the
party.



 


The government is considering divesting some of its stake in the country's largest steel producer SAIL and the same may be discussed in the PSU's board meeting scheduled on Friday.


 


The equity sale could go along with the proposed public issue of the PSU and it is likely to be discussed at its upcoming board meeting, a top steel ministry official said, requesting anonymity.

 

When contacted, Steel Secretary P K Rastogi said: "It is too premature to talk about that (disinvestment). But, right now we are in talks (with SAIL) assessing their funding requirement. Let everything regarding public issue and fund requirement get crystallised."

 

SAIL is awaiting the steel ministry's approval for its proposed public issue to raise funds to part finance its Rs 70,000-crore expansion project.

 

A senior SAIL official, too, said the equity-sale could possibly accompany the proposed public issue. SAIL's board has already approved the public offer.

 

However, the quantum of the proposed disinvestment could not be verified. But, the SAIL official said the measures would be taken in a way that the government's holding in the firm does not fall below 75 per cent.

 

The government currently owns 85.82 per cent stake in SAIL. Besides, about 4.59 per cent is with the Life Insurance Corp and the rest is with the public.


 


Thus, Works the MANUSMRITI Nation Colonised by ZIONIST Imperialism CORPORATE!


 


SAFFRON Parivar at war looks at Sangh.


 


 


Private sector telecom companies can finally bid to launch high-speed data and mobile offerings—better known as 3G, or third generation, services—with the government finally clearing the auction reserve price for pan-India spectrum at Rs 3,500 crore.


 


An empowered group of ministers (eGoM) on Thursday approved a plan to allow what is known in industry circles as ‘4+1’ slots. That is, four private operators in each circle, besides state-owned BSNL or MTNL, who have already been allotted spectrum and are only required to later match the highest bids.

 

Since the matter has been approved by an eGoM headed by finance minister Pranab Mukherjee, it does not need Cabinet ratification. The auctions will be held within 90 days. From the date of spectrum allocation, operators will take around six months to commence operations.


 

Kalam, Chidambaram rebut claim that '98 H-bomb test was dud

 

Amitabh Sinha reports for Indian Express:

 

Dismissing the attempt by one of their former colleagues to rake up an old — and repeatedly demolished — argument that questions the success of India’s only test of a thermonuclear device in 1998, two of the leading scientists behind the Pokharan-II nuclear tests, including former President A P J Abdul Kalam, today said there were no doubts that the experiments had yielded desired results and were a complete success.

Kalam and Principal Scientific Advisor to Prime Minister R Chidambaram rejected the claims of K Santhanam, formerly with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), who used his argument to make the point that India should not sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) as it will have to carry out more tests to verify its thermonuclear technology. Incidentally, a review meeting of the CTBT is slated in the next few weeks.

Chidambaram, who was chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission and Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy when the nuclear tests were conducted in 1998, described Santhanam’s claims as “absurd and “illogical” and “lacking any scientific backing”.

Kalam, who was heading DRDO at that time, and Chidambaram were the leading men behind the five nuclear tests conducted in May of that year, one of which was based on nuclear fusion reaction, the science behind the hydrogen-bomb. It is the yield of this fusion-based test that has been contested by Santhanam.

After the 1998 tests, many scientists have been making the argument that India can now do without further tests — simulated tests can be done on computer — and the country’s interests would not be jeopardized even if New Delhi has to sign the CTBT.

Without going into the merits of India signing CTBT, both Kalam and Chidambaram today reiterated that there was no doubt over the success of the thermonuclear test of 1998.

“After the test, there was a detailed review, based on the two experimental results: (i) seismic measurement close to the site and around, and (ii) radioactive measurement of the material after post shot drill in the test site. From these data, it has been established by the project team that design yield of the thermonuclear test has been obtained,” Kalam said in a statement.

Echoing the views of Kalam, Chidambaram said Santhanam had not produced any fresh scientific data that could cast any doubts over the yield of the fusion explosion. “He is a scientist. He knows arguments have to be backed by scientific facts. If he has any new scientific data that backs his claim and we are not aware of it, we will be very happy to consider his argument,” he said.

Chidambaram said extensive measurements done by scientists after the test had proved the success of the test. “Clear signatures of neutron induced radioactivity had been found which can happen only if 14 MeV neutrons have been generated. It clearly established that the thermonuclear explosion had worked,” he said, adding that he himself had published all the scientific data from the test in an international journal ‘Atoms of Peace’ and it was well accepted all over the world that India’s thermonuclear test was a complete success.







 http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Kalam-Chidambaram-rebut-claim-that-1998-Hbomb-test-was-dud/508271/


Jaswant will not visit Pak for book launch, claims son!


 

In a bid to defuse the crisis in BJP over Vasundhara Raje's continuance as Leader of Opposition in Rajasthan, the party's central leadership has summoned her to the capital on August 31 to meet senior leader M Venkaiah Naidu.

 

Equities edged up in early trade on Friday, as higher markets across Asia lifted investor appetite for risk.

 

At 9:56 a.m., the 30-share BSE index was up 0.3 per cent at 15,825.14 points, with 20 stocks gaining.

 

The 50-share NSE index was up 0.3 per cent at 4,702.05.

 

Anil Ambani group company Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL), engaged in a legal battle with Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) over KG-D6 gas supply and pricing, on Thursday appealed to the petroleum ministry to review the entire gas pricing policy.

RNRL in its communication sent on Thursday to the petroleum secretary RS Pandey also sought the ministry's intervention, asking RIL to end artificial scarcity of gas. RNRL alleged that the perception of scarcity ---a totally artificially created phenomenon— is being exploited by RIL to extract a higher price of gas and make super normal profits.

RNRL argued that despite fall in the international price of gas, RIL's KG-D6 gas price during July 2008 and August 24 has actually gone up by over 20% in rupee terms. The gas price has been denominated in a foreign currency (US Dollars). This has led to an entirely unjustified annual increase, at peak production, of over Rs 3,700 crore for gas consumers.

“Most of this unwarranted increase in gas prices will be borne by power and fertiliser consumers and will lead to a substantial increase in government subsidies. This aberration once again demonstrates the need for the entire gas pricing policy in India to be reviewed, not just on account of the denomination in a foreign currency, but also because of its lack of elasticity in response to sharp movements in global prices,” the company said.

RNRL's letter comes at a time when the Supreme Court has convened hearing on cross petitions from RIL, RNRL and the petroleum ministry on the KG-D6 gas issue on September 1.





 

Sources close to Raje said she will meet Naidu on Monday to discuss the future course of action. Earlier, the party high command had given her time to put in her papers till August 30 when the short session of the state assembly ends.

 

Naidu has been appointed as the pointsman by the High Command to defuse the crisis in the Rajasthan unit of the party.

 

Holding Raje responsible for the party's poor performance in the state assembly elections and the Lok Sabha polls, the BJP had asked her to step down as Leader of Opposition.

 

However, she has put forth three demands before she acceded to the party's decision. She wants her successor as Leader of Opposition to be of her choice, revocation of the suspension order against two of her supporters and a post for herself in Delhi.


 

 

Indian Express reports:

 

All eyes and ears in the deeply divided BJP are tuned to RSS sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat as he addresses his first press conference in the capital on Friday. If the party — marred by expulsions, desertions and factional feud — is expecting a roadmap from Bhagwat, there was some indication of that today with beleaguered president Rajnath Singh and senior leader Murli Manohar Joshi holding long, separate meetings with Bhagwat at the RSS headquarters.

 

 Meanwhile, Expelled BJP leader Jaswant Singh on Friday moved the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat government's ban on his book on Mohammad Ali Jinnah.

 

Singh, along with a representative of Rupa and Co, publisher of the book 'Jinnah - India, Partition, Independence', filed a petition in the apex court against the ban imposed by the Narendra Modi government on August 19, two days after the book's launch.

 

The petition said that the Gujarat government notification banning his book had no mention of the content which called for action and added that the ban was imposed without anyone reading the book.

 

While imposing the ban, hours after Singh was expelled from the party, the state government had alleged that it had defamed the image of the country's first Home Minister Vallabhbhai Patel by "questioning his patriotic spirit".

 

However, Singh maintained that the step amounted to "banning thinking" and likened it to the one taken against noted author Salman Rushdie for his controversial work 'Satanic Verses'.


 

Adding to L K Advani's woes in the midst of a crisis in BJP, former National Security Advisor Brajesh Mishra said on Thursday that the former Home Minister was part of the NDA government's decision to release three terrorists and to send Jaswant Singh to Kandahar for securing hostages' release.

 

"The decision was taken by the Cabinet Committee on Security which has, you know, five members- - Prime Minister, Home Minister, Finance Minister, External Affairs Minister and Defence Minister.

 

"....once those demands were whittled down to three terrorists and no money and no interred remains (of some terrorist), then there was a unanimous decision of the CCS that in order to save the lives of 160 plus hostages and the aircraft crew, it made sense to release these three terrorists and get the hostages back," Mishra told Karan Thapar on Devil’s Advocate programme.

When asked if it was an unanimous decision, he replied, "Of course".

 

Q: Was Advani part and parcel of it?


A: Yes, of course.



Mishra, who is considered close to former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, said Advani was also aware of the decision to send External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh to Kandahar to secure the release of hostages.

"Again the CCS met and Mr Jaswant Singh proposed that he would go to Kandahar to bring back the hostages and he explained that the Indian representatives who were negotiating in Kandahar - diplomats, IB, RAW - they had suggested that somebody should be there to take care of any last minute complications. This he informed the CCS and they agreed to send (him)," Mishra said.

When asked again if this was an unanimous decision, Mishra replied in the affirmative.

On whether Advani was a party to the decision, he said yes.

"Three members of CCS, George Fernandes (then defence minister), Jaswant Singh and Yashwant Sinha (Finance Minister) have already said this," Mishra added.

The former NSA clarified that initially no one was in favour of any concession while dealing with the hijackers. "To begin with, they wanted the release of 36 terrorists. They wanted $ 200 million. And they wanted the interred remains of some terrorist. Nobody was prepared to accept this. Each and every member (of CCS) was opposed to agreeing to those demands," he said.

 

 


Pak examining fresh evidence against Saeed: Malik


 Pakistan has said it will examine the fresh evidence provided by India on the basis of which Interpol issued a Red Corner Notice against JuD chief Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, the prime accused in planning and executing the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks.

"We will examine it (the Red Corner Notice)," Pakistan Interior Minister Rehman Malik said in response to a question on the Interpol notice issued for Saeed at a news conference in London on Thursday.

Malik said "certain procedures were required to pursue" the (Interpol) notice.

Interpol circulated the notice for Saeed on Tuesday after a special court in Mumbai issued a non-bailable arrest warrant for the JuD chief for his involvement in planning and executing the Mumbai terror attacks.

Malik said Pakistan will never allow anyone to use its territory "against India or anyone else".

India recently handed over to Pakistan the latest dossier on the Mumbai attack that provides extensive information on Saeed's contacts with the 10 terrorists who carried out the strikes and his role in training and motivating them.

Malik said Pakistan has received this latest dossier from India but needs to examine whether "it meets the procedural requirements". He added: "We need tangible evidence which can stand the test of the court."

The action taken by the Pakistan government to investigate the Mumbai attacks has been "very transparent", Malik claimed.

Five persons were arrested earlier while two more persons were apprehended later, he said, adding that he would provide more information about these two persons soon.

He also referred to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's recent remarks that there is credible information that Pakistan-based terror groups might carry out fresh attacks in India and said New Delhi should share this information with Islamabad.

"Please give us some information. We want that information because we want to go to the depth (of the matter)," he said.

Noting that India had arrested several suspects well before the Mumbai attacks, Malik claimed the incident "would not have happened" if Islamabad had received information in this regard in time.

Five Lashker-e-Taiba operatives - including operations commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and communications expert Zarar Shah - arrested by Pakistani authorities in connection with the Mumbai incident are currently facing trial in an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi.

Saeed, who is also the founder of the LeT, was placed under house arrest in December last year after the UN Security Council declared the JuD a terror group but was freed on the orders of the Lahore High Court in June.


 


Govt eyes $200 bn export; doles out sops!


 


India extended tax holiday and duty refund for exporters, while allowing duty free capital goods import under its Foreign Trade Policy to insulate them from protectionism induced by recession abroad. Unveiling the five-year policy, Commerce Minister Anand Sharma set a target of USD 200 billion worth exports for next fiscal, a feat that India failed to achieve in 2008-09 due to a slump in global demand in the face of financial crisis.


 


"India has not been affected to the same extent as other economies of the world, yet our exports have suffered a decline in the last 10 months due to a contraction in demand in the traditional markets. The protectionist measures being adopted by some of these countries have aggravated the problem," he said, presenting his first trade policy.

 

While exports for the April-June quarter contracted by 31 per cent, Sharma set a growth target of 15 per cent for FY'10.

 

"I would be hesitant to hazard a guess on the nature and extent of this recovery and the time the major economies will take to return to there pre-recession growth levels," he said, encouraging exporters to look beyond traditional markets like the US and western Europe.

 

Extension of income tax holiday for export units for one more year and continuance of duty refund scheme till December 2010 and enhanced assistance for the scheme for development of markets are among the measures in the FTP.


 










Font Size

ANI


Posted: Aug 27, 2009 at 1432 hrs IST






Jaswant singh




BJP summons Raje to Delhi on MondayParivar at war looks at SanghJaswant invokes Mahabharat to defend Adv...




New Delhi Expelled BJP leader Jaswant Singh will not be visiting Pakistan for the launch of his controversial book – ''Jinnah- India, Partition, Independence'', his son Manvendra Singh revealed to a new agency.


Manvendra Singh said that his father has not applied for a visa, and as far as he knew, there was no Pakistan edition of the book.

It may be recalled that Jaswant Singh was expelled by the BJP last week for launching the book.

 

 

 

 


 

 







Peace nudge from Jaswant











Jaswant Singh











Darjeeling, Aug. 27:
Jaswant Singh has advised the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha leadership to
“move beyond agitation” and concentrate on development while
maintaining “peaceful activism”.





The Darjeeling MP’s appeal came in response to a questionnaire from The Telegraph.





In
his reply, Jaswant said he remained dedicated to the Gorkhaland demand,
fielding a question on the impact of his expulsion from the BJP (excerpts below).





The
Morcha on its part has partially endorsed Singh’s advice but maintained
that it might have to go back to the masses if the state and the Centre
do not sincerely look into the statehood issue.





Harka
Bahadur Chhetri, the Morcha’s publicity secretary, said: “Of late, we
have taken the path of peaceful activism. We made this point even
during the tripartite meeting but if the state and the Centre start
coming up with counter strategies to derail our movement we will have
to fall back on the masses. We are trying our best to solve the problem
through negotiations across the table.”





As
matters stand now, the Morcha has withdrawn its agitation programme
after the August 11 talks with representatives of the Centre and the
state government where it was agreed that the Darjeeling Gorkha Hill
Council would be disbanded and the Sixth Schedule bill scrapped.





However, it has still not told hill residents to start paying telephone and power bills and taxes to the state government.





The next round of talks will be in Darjeeling on December 21.








The
Telegraph: Do you think your disassociation with the BJP is a setback
for the Gorkhaland demand as the Morcha has hinted that it would need
both you and the BJP to achieve its demand?





Jaswant
Singh: No, I don’t. I made a commitment to the issue, I was elected on
the issue and I remain dedicated to the issue. As for the BJP, they
included the issue in their election manifesto and I see no reason for
them to backtrack.








TT:
If at any time the BJP pressures the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha to sever
ties with you, would you think of resigning as the Member of Parliament
from Darjeeling?





JS:
My position is clear. I remain a representative of Darjeeling because
the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha showed faith in me and asked me to continue.









TT: How do you plan to mobilise support for the demand in the wake of the recent developments?





JS:
I will actively continue to engage members across party lines to
generate support and awareness among my colleagues on the Gorkhaland
issue, as I have done over the past months.









TT: What would be your advice to sthe Gorkha Janmukti Morcha, vis-à-vis the agitation and the recent political developments?





JS: We have to move beyond agitation and concentrate on the development of the region while maintaining peaceful activism.


http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090828/jsp/bengal/story_11419730.jsp

A strong BJP needed for healthy democracy

The
day you start banning a book for political scores, democracy is in
danger. A close aide of Atal-Advani, Sudheendra Kulkarni has also
resigned from the party. He has resigned citing the "ideological
differences" with the party.
CJ: Rishabh..

THE OPPOSITION, Bhartiya Janata
Party is making news for a week now. The "Chintan Baithak" held in
Shimla last week gave no solutions to the ailments of the party.
Instead it was overshadowed by the expulsion of senior leader Jaswant Singh and the leakage of the election analysis report.
 
The expulsion of Jaswant Singh
over a book is overzealous. And the manner in which he was expelled
made matters even worse. There can be no justification to ban his book
in Gujarat. What Jaswant Singh
has expressed is only his personal view and not of the party's. The
party could always disassociate from his viewpoint, present its own
thoughts on the discussion and make its stance clear. If the BJP was so miffed then they should have answered Jaswant's book by another book on their viewpoint.
 
The
day you start banning a book for political scores, democracy is in
danger. A close aide of Atal-Advani, Sudheendra Kulkarni has also
resigned from the party. He has resigned citing the "ideological
differences" with the party. Arun Shourie has also lambasted the party and its top leadership. The way BJP is tackling the issues, he might be the next to be expelled from the party.
 
One thing clearly visible is that BJP has lost its vision and is in a leadership crisis. Rajnath Singh
must be held responsible for this. A leader is the one who owes
responsibility and introspects the causes of failure. But the current
leadership is just not doing it. They don't want to hear some very
valid points being raised within the party.
 
So,
the party is ignoring the lack of accountability and factionalism. They
are just looking for scape goats. Instead of rebuilding the party,
leaders are busy with the media commitments and speaking nonsense on TV
channels. If it continues to function this way then these are not a
good signals for the party and country as well. It is imperative for
the RSS to ensure smooth transition of generation in the party. There
is so much infighting among the next generation leaders that it is
denting the image of party with each passing day. The party appears to
be in complete disarray and disjointed.

BJP is needed for the smooth functioning of our democracy. As Tarun Vijay said, "Suppose if there was no Jan Sangh or the BJP,
there would have been no Kashmir movement, no demands to scrap two
flags and two constitutional provisions for an Indian state and
abolishing two Constitutional heads system for it. Who would have taken
up the cause of an invincible Indian security and carried out the
Pokaran II nuclear tests while preparing for Pokaran III?"
 
In
a nation where most of the political parties are known by the names of
their dynasties turning the political process into a kind of family
fiefdom, the existence of a party that still runs on democratic norms
and represents a completely different ethos, must be valued. That is
the Bharatiya Janata Party. It is useless to indulge in the
contemporary dichotomies and scuffles that mar its current framework.
 
It
is important that the party conveys its ideology and packages itself in
a way that can impress 21st century India. The party needs to take some
tough decisions and devote time in getting a makeover. There is no
shame if it represents itself as the party catering to Hindu interests
as long as it does not becomes communal.
 
BJP
needs to remember the words and vision of its founder, Deen Dayal
Upadhyay and Shyama Prasad Mukherjee. At the first all India session of
the Bharatiya Jan Sangh, its founder president Dr Shyama Prasad
Mookerjee had said, “We must be able to carry all sections of the
people with us by creating in their minds a healthy and progressive
attitude of co-operation based on true equality of opportunity and
mutual tolerance and understanding. Our party's door remains open to
all who believe in our programme and ideology irrespective of
considerations of caste and religion. ”
 
Without
mincing any words he declared, “Our party though, ever prepared to
extend its hand of equality to all citizens, does not feel ashamed to
urge for the consolidation of Hindu society. We are not so mean as to
forget that in this gigantic process our country came into contact and
conflict with many foreign races and ideologies and our great ancestors
had the courage to fashion and refashion the country's structure in
accordance with new ideas and with the changed conditions of our
society. If India's freedom is to be purposeful, a correct appreciation
of the fundamental features of Indian culture - the discovery of that
unity in diversity, which is the keynote of her civilization -- is
highly essential.”

BJP
is party of nationalists and it needs to remain one. However, it has to
rebrand itself and become the saviour of the middle class which it once
represented. It is equally important to refrain from any sort of
communalism. It is a national alternative to the Congress, more so
after this election which has pushed regional parties and their
identity politics to the margins. There are, after all, no full stops
in politics.
http://www.merinews.com/article/a-strong-bjp-needed-for-healthy-democracy/15782546.shtml

BJP stands to lose its hate artillery to Jinnah's phoenix











The
phoenix of Jinnah dug out by Jaswant Singh may not hit the BJP too hard now as
he does not enjoy much clout in the party. Nevertheless, his

book has sent waves
which may deprive the party of its hate artillery in the long run and this is
probably what it is most worried about. Besides, it feels hurt about the
inclusion of Sardar Patel's name, whom it considers its own despite his having
been a Congressman all his life, among those responsible for the country's
partition while the Congress wants to salvage its two top leaders, particularly
Nehru, from the blame game.



The Urdu press, as a whole, does not seem
to be interested in Jinnah's perception as a benefactor of Muslims, but is happy
over the acknowledgement that the community is not being seen as a sole agent of
partition. Sahafat (17/8) minces no words in declaring that the Indian Muslims
have no soft spot in their hearts for Jinnah as he has created problems for them
rather than solving them.


While branding the Jaswant's
arguments as also the Advani's certificate of secularism to Jinnah as a bid to
win over the Muslims, the daily did not envisage Jaswant's ouster which annuls
the ploy theory. On the other hand, Aag (20/8) is sore about the expulsion as
the number of people who could delve on hot issues with a cool mind is
diminishing in the party. It is also all praise for Jaswant for refusing to get
worked up on his exit.


But a middle by Hasan Kamal in
Sahafat (19/8) quotes Ayesha Jalal to say that Jinnah had in his August 11,
1947, speech said that with the passage of time, the Hindus and Muslims of
Pakistan will become its citizens, politically, not religiously and later as the
first Governor-General he had said now the western borders of India will be
defended by Pakistan and the Southern one by the Indian government. But Qaumi
Khabren (20/8) blames the BJP for doubt talk on every issue and recounts
Jaswant's stand that Jinnah was forced to carve a new land for Muslims who were
afraid of the majority in the new set-up. Gandhi, it refers to Jaswant's book,
had a visible Hindu identity while Jinnah was non-communal and nationalist and
also mentions Jaswant's claim that the term Hindutva was never used during the
days of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and was introduced later to mislead the
people.



Gujarat entanglement: The retired additional director-general
of Gujarat police RK Shrikumar, has handed over to the IST probing the Gulbarg
Society carnage on the order of the Supreme Court, a CD allegedly recording the
home secretary's order to him to keep away from the Nanawati and Shah
Commissions or else his promotion will be in jeopardy. Besides, he has told the
IST that the director-general of police had told him that the chief minister
wants Hindus to be allowed to ventilate their anger on the burning down of the
kar sewaks in Godhra.



Mohammad Musanna: The death of Mohammad Musanna
Rizvi (81), a well-known progressive writer, has deprived the Urdu world of
literature of a critic, poet and scholar. Rizvi, former head of the philosophy
department of a post-graduate college in Gaya, had done his PhD on `Scientific
humanism and Nehru's concept of life.'





More Stories from this section


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4926098.cms

Coalition politics needed to end Congress hegemony: Advani



August 21st, 2009 - 7:27 pm ICT by IANS

himla, Aug 21 (IANS) Senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader L.K.
Advani Friday said coalition politics was a necessity to end the
“hegemony of the Congress” in the country’s political system.

“Coalition politics is necessary to end Congress hegemony. It is the
necessity in India’s political system,” senior BJP leader Sushma Swaraj
cited Advani as saying in his address to the party’s three-day
introspection meet that ended here.

“Even in the chintan baithak (introspection session), the pros and
cons of coalition politics were discussed in detail,” she told
reporters during a press briefing.


In his address, Advani said coalition politics was not a recent
phenomenon and even the founder of Jana Sangh, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee,
had formed a coalition in the first Lok Sabha.


Advani admitted that the image of the party had taken a beating. It
is due to “infighting, frustration and lack of self-confidence” among
the party workers.


Swaraj said quoting Advani: “Our graph from 1989 to 1999 was at its
best and we formed the government at the centre. Between 1999 and 2009,
we lost two parliamentary elections consecutively. So introspection is
a must.”


“In 1984, even when we had two MPs, the people had faith in us,”
said Advani. And added: “Today we have 116 seats in the Lok Sabha, so
there is no need for frustration.”


“This ‘chintan baithak’ is the first step towards improvement and to
resolve issues through dialogue and interaction,” Swaraj quoted Advani
as saying.



http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/politics/coalition-politics-needed-to-end-congress-hegemony-advani_100236009.html
 
Wed, Aug 26, 2009 13:48:20 IST

Parivar at war looks at Sangh






Font Size

Suman K Jha

Posted: Aug 28, 2009 at 0941 hrs IST



Rajnath singh





New Delhi All eyes and ears in the deeply divided BJP are tuned to RSS sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat as he addresses his first press conference in the capital on Friday. If the party — marred by expulsions, desertions and factional feud — is expecting a roadmap from Bhagwat, there was some indication of that today with beleaguered president Rajnath Singh and senior leader Murli Manohar Joshi holding long, separate meetings with Bhagwat at the RSS headquarters.

Just days ago, before the chintan baithak in Shimla set off Jaswant Singh’s expulsion and Arun Shourie’s diatribe, Bhagwat had talked of the need for discipline in the BJP and a “younger leadership.” When and how (to work on this) is the BJP’s job, he had said.

While Singh’s expulsion — over his Jinnah book and his remarks on Sardar Patel — overshadowed the chintan baithak, the BJP resolved that L K Advani would continue as the parliamentary party leader for the next five years.

What Bhagwat says assumes an extra dimension now given that Shourie — in an interview to Shekhar Gupta, Editor-in-Chief of The Indian Express, on NDTV’s Walk the Talk early this week — openly called for “the RSS to take over the party” after easing out the top brass.

In sharp contrast to Jaswant who was promptly expelled, Shourie has not yet been issued any “clarification notice” even after his virulent attack against the party leadership, including against Rajnath Singh (Shourie called him “Alice in Blunderland”).

“A clarification notice would be issued to him after BJP Legislative Party leader in Rajasthan Vasundhara Raje relinquishes her position,” said a senior BJP leader, in what suggested a deep-rooted divide in the party.

Rajnath has been keen to secure Raje’s resignation while going slow on action against Shourie. The Rajnath camp has maintained that the local RSS unit in Rajasthan is against Raje.

Advani, meanwhile, came under renewed attack from some former colleagues of former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Former National Security Advisor Brajesh Mishra reiterated today that Advani was, indeed, aware of “Jaswant Singh going to Kandahar to secure the release of hostages in the event of the hijack of the IC 814 aircraft”.

He had first made these revelations on Walk The Talk in June this year. “When that decision was taken in the Cabinet Committee on Security, Mr Jaswant Singh said that he wanted to go and make sure that everything was all right because he had received a message from the negotiators in Kandahar that it would be good for somebody at a high level to come here, because there could be some last-minute problems. None of us visualised that he was going there with the three terrorists”.

Asked about Advani’s claim “that he was not aware that Jaswant was going there,” Mishra had said: “I think it was Mr George Fernandes who said that perhaps Mr Advani has forgotten that he was there... I have already quoted Mr George Fernandes. I think we should take a more detached view of this. It wasn’t good that Mr Jaswant Singh was travelling in the same plane, but he wanted to get these hostages back and we should concentrate on that”.

On Thursday, he repeated much the same, while speaking to The Indian Express. He was supported by Yashwant Sinha, also close to Vajpayee and now to Rajnath Singh. Both Mishra and Sinha criticised Jaswant Singh’s expulsion.

The BJP reacted sharply to their comments. Party spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said: “The allegations of Mishra, who is not a BJP member, are unfounded, unfortunate, and also appear to be motivated”. Chairman of BJP Disciplinary Committee Ram Naik said: “The expulsion of Jaswant Singh from the party is a closed chapter. The utterances of MPs (here that of Yashwant Sinha), however, need to be evaluated by the BJP Parliamentary Party and Parliamentary Board”. Bhagwat is likely to delve into the discipline issue again during his press conference tomorrow.






Maya says curtains down on money-minting birthday bash






Font Size

Sanjay Singh

Posted: Aug 28, 2009 at 0427 hrs IST



Maya birthday







Lucknow After her last birthday celebrations ran into controversy over allegations of forcible collection of money, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati on Thursday told her party leaders that no such exercise should be carried out in future to mark the occasion.

Till this year, the BSP used to celebrate her birthday on January 15 as “Arthik Sahyog Diwas” (ASD).

The announcement was made by her at the BSP national convention in Lucknow where she was elected as the party’s national president for the third consecutive term.

“Mayawati has directed the party representatives that the monetary help given on her birthday is being abolished from next year,” a press release issued by the party stated.

Following the death of a PWD engineer M K Gupta in December 2008, after he was allegedly asked to give money for the CM’s birthday, Mayawati had to face bitter criticism from the Opposition.

BSP leaders have welcomed the latest decision saying the party would now instead focus on increasing the number of memberships.

“This is a good decision. Instead of celebrating Mayawati’s birthday as ASD, we will now undertake efforts to increase the number of party members,” said a leader.

The party has, however, increased its membership fee. “For the last six years, the party had not increased its membership fee. Now, the party would charge Rs 40 as membership fee,” a BSP leader said. The membership drive will be launched from January 1 to March 31.

At the convention, Mayawati discussed political strategies for the forthcoming Maharashtra and Haryana Assembly elections.

She directed the party leaders to undertake agitations across the country against the Congress-led UPA government over the issue of rising prices.







 


SC assets resolution for High Courts






Font Size

Maneesh Chhibber

Posted: Aug 28, 2009 at 1025 hrs IST

New Delhi A day after judges of the Supreme Court passed a resolution deciding to declare their assets and make them public, it was learnt that copies of the resolution would be sent to Chief Justices of all High Courts.

Sources told The Indian Express that Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan could personally write to all Chief Justices, urging them to place the matter before their respective full courts so that similar resolutions are passed.

“Under the present system, the CJI has no administrative control of the HCs and the resolution of the judges of the SC is not binding on the judges of the HCs. The CJI can only suggest to them to follow suit,” sources said.

As for the case filed by the SC Registry in the Delhi HC, challenging an order of the Central Information Commission on the issue of assets of judges, sources said a final decision was still to be taken. “We need to understand that the larger issue before Delhi HC is whether details of assets of judges of the SC and HCs are within the purview of the RTI Act or not. The resolution passed yesterday doesn’t say anything on this issue. It is for the CJI to decide the future course of action,” the sources pointed out. On May 4, the HC had reserved its order on the apex court’s plea.

Meanwhile, sources in the Law Ministry on Thursday asserted that despite the resolution of SC judges, the government was committed to push the proposed law to make it mandatory for judges and their kin to declare their assets. “A meeting will be held next week to decide whether the law should be a stand-alone legislation like the Judges (Assets and Liabilities) Bill, 2009 or if there should be clause to this effect as was contained in the now-defunct Judges (Inquiry) Bill, 2008. Since the resolution has no legal standing like an earlier one passed in 1997, the Government is keen to bring in the legislation,” said a senior Ministry officer.

Union Law Minister M Veerappa Moily has welcomed the decision of SC judges saying, “It is for the judges to decide how it should be done because they know best what is best for the judiciary.”





 

IPL first season made Rs 661 cr, BCCI got only Rs 15 cr







Font Size

Archna Shukla


Posted: Aug 28, 2009 at 0904 hrs IST

 

In its first season, the Indian Premier League (IPL) contributed less than Rs 15 crore to the coffers of the Board of Control for Cricket in India.

A draft note on the IPL’s income and expenditure in the year ended March 2009, part of the BCCI’s detailed financial accounts being circulated among board members for their perusal, shows that while the high-profile tournament generated Rs 661 crore in total income, its surplus, which is the amount left after accounting for expenses, was only Rs 14.86 crore.

The expenses included share of franchisees in IPL’s income from media rights and sponsorships, prize money, opening ceremony expenses, advertisements, and Rs 26 crore as compensation to Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals for the cancelled Champions League 2008.

Two senior members of BCCI confirmed that the board was reviewing its accounts for the 2008-09 year and a draft copy of the financial statements had been sent to the members for vetting. The accounts are expected to be approved by the board in its meeting scheduled for September 2.

According to the draft note, a copy of which is with The Indian Express, one of the biggest contributors to IPL’s income were the media rights sold to broadcast company Multi Screen Media Pvt Ltd and sports marketing company World Sports Group.

The league got Rs 242 crore in the first year from the deal, which was negotiated at $1.02 billion for 10 years. This included a $108 million commitment for promoting the event. The media rights were renegotiated with the same partners at $1.6 billion, for nine years, from the second season onwards.

In the first year, franchisee consideration brought in around Rs 290 crore and sponsorships Rs 111 crore. Among the other sources of income were pouring rights (Rs 10 crore) signed with beverage company PepsiCo.

As promised by the IPL management, a large part of the revenue generated was shared with franchisees and also on initiatives to build the excitement around the event. Around Rs 220 crore, for instance, was awarded to franchisees as part of their share in IPL's central revenue pool. The league also shared the Rs 10 crore from the income from pouring rights with the franchisees. The IPL management spent around Rs 33 crore on advertising, whereas league and administrative expenses accounted for an additional Rs 65 crore.

Lalit Modi, the chairman of IPL, declined to comment saying he had not seen the accounts. He, however, said: “...profits may have been less, but you should look at the total money (generated by IPL).”

M P Pandove, honorary treasurer of the BCCI, said he could not comment on the issue because the financial accounts of BCCI for 2008-09 were still with the auditors.


http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/IPL-first-season-made-Rs-661-cr-BCCI-got-only-Rs-15-cr/508259/



I don't know Shah Rukh: Salman Khan






Font Size

BollywoodHungamaNewsNetwork

Posted: Aug 28, 2009 at 1058 hrs IST



Salman khan




Mumbai "You work with people you don't know. I don't know Shah Rukh so I don't mind working with anybody," says Salman Khan on the prospect of working in a film with friend-turned-foe Shah Rukh Khan. "If there's something good, I wouldn't have a problem that's if he doesn't have a problem. As long as those 100 days go off peacefully and don't have any problems," Salman adds. He rates Karan Arjun as one of his favourite films (where he created magic with Shah Rukh Khan).

Salman is known for his big heart and helping nature. In a cut throat industry, he is quite a rarity. "I don't have any insecurity or jealousies that ye bada star banega and he is going to take over and we are going to be thrown out. I don't care about that stuff at all. Woh apni mehnat par hai, apne fans ke upar depend karta hai, how long you're going to be there. Fans are saying jab tak you want us to see you, we will see you," Salman says with a smile.

With the buzz around his next release ‘Wanted’ gaining a huge momentum and the promos of ‘Main Aur Mrs Khanna’ and ‘London Dreams’ attracting attention, it is a unanimous perception that Salman Khan is all set to make a lethal comeback this year. In a no holds barred interview, Salman bared his heart out on his forthcoming films, prospects of a sequel of Andaz Apna Apna, the arduous task of maintaining his chiseled frame and lots more.





PM faces benefit plan rebellion


















Frank Field: 'There will be a natural revolt on the Labour benches'







The government faces a backbench rebellion over plans that could reduce housing benefit by up to £15 a week.

Ministers
are considering ending a policy which allows people who rent homes for
less than their maximum benefit to keep the difference.

About 300,000 people gained from the measure introduced last year. Ministers say scrapping it will save £150m.

Labour MP Frank Field said that was "crazy" and said he would table a Commons motion to block it.

And
fellow Labour MP Karen Buck told the Times Labour should not "under any
circumstances" be forcing the poorest to choose between affordable
housing bills and other living costs.

Key reform

Since
last year, housing benefit claimants have been entitled to a cash
payback of up to £15 a week if they find accommodation at a lower rent
than the level of housing allowance set by their local authority.

The
change, a key part of the government's reform of housing benefit, was
meant to encourage people on low incomes to shop around for the best
deal when looking for rented accommodation.

Of the 600,000
people who claim the housing allowance, about half are thought to have
retained the surplus money - amounting to up to £780 a year in some
cases.

A proposal to end the measure, included in the Budget,
is now under consultation. If approved it would come into force next
April, just ahead of an expected general election.





















This small change will not affect our customers' ability to pay their rent and further support is available












Department for Work and Pensions spokesman













Mr Field, a former welfare minister who led the Labour rebellion
against the abolition of the 10p tax rate, said the timing "could have
been decided in Conservative headquarters".

The measure was both "unfair" and "short-sighted", he told the BBC.

He
said the savings achieved would be "miniscule" in terms of what the
government needed to achieve to address its budget deficit as landlords
would simply put up the rent or claimants would stop looking for
cheaper deals.

Mr Field plans to put down a motion when
Parliament returns in October opposing the measure and expected to get
support from other Labour MPs and opposition parties.

"I think
there will be a natural revolt on Labour benches if the government
tries to push this reform through," he told the BBC.

"We are
not going to get through this mega-debt crisis which has engulfed the
country by these sort of very small cuts in public expenditure which
are clearly immensely important for people at the bottom who have
least.

"We need to keep our eye on the big game. I don't think
any Labour backbenchers are going to be in the mood to allow the first
of these cuts to fall on people who are at the bottom of the pile."

'Cynical'

The
Liberal Democrats, who first drew attention to the proposal, said it
could reduce some families' weekly income by 20%, money they had come
to rely upon.

"I feel very angry about this," said housing spokesman Sarah Teather.

"When
I think about the impact on my constituents, £15 will be a huge amount
of their income. It seems to be a very cynical move."

Housing charity Crisis also said the proposal was "ill-considered and potentially counterproductive".

The government said the proposed change would not prevent people most in need from being able to find decent accommodation.

"This
small change will not affect our customers' ability to pay their rent
and further support is available to those on a low income to help with
other expenses," a spokesman for the Department of Work and Pensions
said.









Government defeats 10p tax rebels










07 Jul 09 | 
UK Politics










Brown faces down Labour critics










08 Jun 09 | 
UK Politics










Leaders clash on public spending










17 Jun 09 | 
UK Politics





























RELATED INTERNET LINKS













The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



































FROM OTHER NEWS SITES




Mail Online UK Brown facing backbench revolt over plans to slash benefits for the poorest by up to a fifth - 31 mins ago





New Statesman* Brown faces backbench rebellion over benefits cuts - 1 hr ago





Telegraph Gordon Brown faces revolt over benefit changes - 2 hrs ago





Times Online Brown to take cash from poor families - 3 hrs ago





The Independent Brown 'faces backbench revolt over benefit changes' - 3 hrs ago




* Requires registration






































News feeds| News feeds

























South Asia



















































Page last updated at 10:59 GMT, Friday, 28 August 2009 11:59 UK



















































































Pakistani nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan at his home in Islamabad after a court verdict on Feb 6, 2009










A Pakistani court lifts the final curbs on disgraced nuclear scientist, Dr AQ Khan, allowing him total freedom of movement.
































































International aid agency Oxfam warns that millions of rural poor in Nepal could face hunger as a result of climate change.

































An expelled leader of India's main opposition challenges the decision
by an Indian state to ban his book on Pakistan's founder.







































FEATURES, NEWS, ANALYSIS
































The crisis of credibility for India's judges



































Was a former Indian prime minister murdered?



































The unanswered questions of bloody Bangladesh mutiny

















































































































































MORE FROM SOUTH ASIA


























































































































Pakistan-UK illegal migrant deal


































































































BUSINESS



































































FEATURES











































































































































Water woes



1965 war photos



Rare Nehru



Sri Lanka war



Afghan school



Reluctant return



Biswa Ijtema



Gujarat nomads



Afghan troops



Afghan mines



Cyclone homeless



Indian farmers



Afghan funerals



Kite's eye view



Indian railways



Mosque siege



Nepali Goddesses



Nepal children



Mud disaster



Mosque bomb



Peshawar bomb



Indian mutiny



Tiger air raid



Cricket fans



Cricket colour



Afghan births



Plane restored



Bob Woolmer



Cricket fever



Kabul-Kandahar



Tsunami question



Baloch housing



Uri return



Earthquake - Uri



Heat and dust



India's Africans



Karachi homeless



Tsunami survivor



Women and war



Death at birth



Indian postman



Afghan life 1



Afghan life 2



Animal Fair



B'desh climate




 


































































A GUIDE TO SOUTH ASIA



























Choose a country



Afghanistan

Bangladesh

Bhutan

India

The Maldives

Nepal

Pakistan

Sri Lanka



 



































Find a territory



Kashmir




 




























Compiled by BBC Monitoring




















































FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
































How one Italian city is learning to love cricket



































Election monitoring is big business but can we trust them?



































Winning entry to India's Institutes of Technology











































OTHER TOP STORIES






























Advertisement































































































































MOST POPULAR STORIES


From South Asia in the past week



































































Select a city:

Calcutta

Colombo

Dhaka

Islamabad

Kabul

Karachi

Kathmandu

Mumbai

New Delhi



 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/default.stm












People to Ulfa: Spare our road












The road after construction was left unfinished











Dibrugarh, Aug. 27: Some
parts of the country may be furiously debating Jinnah’s role in
Partition but a suffering populace in Assam knows what it needs and has
summoned the courage to speak its mind.





Thousands
of villagers have told the dreaded Ulfa to keep off central funds meant
to build a road, possibly the first such appeal in militancy-wracked
Assam.





The
villagers of Puroni Sapekhati in Sivasagar district today asked the
banned outfit, notorious for its extortion demands, to spare the money.





The
collective appeal came after Ulfa asked a contractor engaged in
constructing the road to pay up Rs 50 lakh, stalling the project in the
Upper Assam area.





The
villagers, who have no direct line of communication with the outfit,
formed a committee to voice their appeal, hoping that the invisible
eyes and ears of Ulfa would pick up the message. “If you desire that we
the people of this economically backward area should live in peace,
please spare the development funds,” one villager said.





In
the past, too, there have been instances of villagers protesting
murders carried out by the group, but this is possibly the first time
that they have organised themselves against a threat to stall
development.





Puroni
Sapekhati, which covers around 200 villages, was once a prosperous
region but fell behind because of poor communication and transport
links. After repeated appeals, the government recently sanctioned Rs
14.14 crore under the Tenth Plan for a road linking the area to
Pithaguti in Dibrugarh district.





The
North Eastern Council was asked to implement the 22km project, but hit
a bump when the firm hired to construct a 6km stretch of the road at a
cost of Rs 4.23 crore stopped work after the extortion demand.





“After
decades of neglect, when something positive was finally happening, the
work had to stop,” said Bijoy Gogoi, a member of the villagers’
committee. “We have come to know that the project was stalled because
Ulfa demanded money. We appeal to Ulfa to withdraw its demand in the
greater interest of the poor people and society.”





Although Ulfa has weakened in Upper Assam, it still has influence in isolated pockets such as Sapekhati.






“We will soon start a signature, poster and banner campaign in the
area, appealing to the outfit to withdraw its demand,” committee
assistant general secretary Keshob Gogoi said.





Top









http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090828/jsp/frontpage/story_11419714.jsp








A TALE OF TWO BROTHERS












- With friends in the right places, monopoly is easy































Maybe
it was in her upbringing. Joan Robinson’s father was, after all, a
general in the British army during World War I. She had always a
no-nonsense approach to life and things, and could not suffer fools.
She could not suffer foolish ideas either. As a young lecturer in
Cambridge’s economics faculty in the early 1930s, she was bothered by
the assumption of the free market, which was the starting point of the
economics she had to impart to her students. The free market postulated
the existence of an infinite number of sellers and an infinite number
of buyers. But, Joan Robinson snorted, in real life one never came
across an infinite number of sellers or producers. The number of
producers in any line of manufacture might be sizeable, but by no means
countless. Very often they were only a handful. Since the empirical
foundation of existing economic theory was so weak, the prescriptions
based on it could hardly be relied upon to either cure the ills of
society or nurture it to growth and prosperity.





Joan
Robinson made up her mind; she had to do something about it. She sat
down to work, and developed an alternative concept of the market
structure more truthfully reflecting the realities of life. The result
was the Economics of Imperfect Competition, which immediately
set the river of economic theory on fire. She showed that even if there
were initially a moderately large number of sellers or producers in any
branch of production, there was a tendency for this number to reduce.
The more efficient and resourceful among the producers gradually weed
out the less efficient and less resourceful ones, until a stage arrives
when supplies to that particular market come under the grip of a single
seller or producer. This single producer, Joan Robinson demonstrated,
had a single goal: the maximizing of profit, which is made possible
through restricting the output and hiking the price of the product. Her
tour de force dealt a lethal blow to the belief fostered by
traditional economic analysis that the free market ensures ideal output
and a just price for all. The free market, she snorted, ends up in
restrictive output and monopolistic price-setting.








The
market is not free, the market is not perfect; it is dominated by a
few, the monopolists. Even so, one fact is incontrovertible: a monopoly
does not spring overnight, there is a market process, a certain number
of entrepreneurs engage against one another, confrontation takes place
between competing bunches of resources, strategies and skills,
temporary successes alternating with temporary setbacks. In the final
round, though, one of the entrepreneurs leaves the others behind,
lagging rivals drop out, the one left in the field establishes a
monopoly. It may be a long process, or a short one, but the emergence
of a monopoly in a capitalist system entails a course of toil and
application.





Not
so, apparently, in post-1991, economically liberalized India, if the
recent goings-on in the nation’s energy sector are to be taken as
criterion. Not that the nation has been privileged to know much of
these proceedings; the ministry of petroleum and natural gas, the
formal custodian of the sector, jealously guards its secrets. But some
facts have now become public knowledge by courtesy of the spat between
two brothers belonging to an entrepreneur family. The revealed
knowledge poses a challenge to Joan Robinson on one significant point.





Natural
gas is a crucial source of energy; the Indian peninsula is supposed to
have reserves of oil and natural gas amounting to billions and billions
of dollars. During the long reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, one of his
ministers, Keshav Dev Malviya, bubbling over with enthusiasm, took the
pledge to develop this precious source of energy in the public sector.
He set up the Oil and Natural Gas Commission and the Indian Oil
Corporation: the former was to be solely in charge of ‘upstream’
activities such as exploration and development; downstream activities,
including distribution, would be in the care of the IOC, although
private parties too would not be quite left out.





Malviya
had spun out his logic. Explorations of oil and natural gas call for
huge investment of funds. In case State agencies had a major share of
the market for their distribution, the net earnings from there could be
ploughed back and deployed upstream to hasten the pace of exploration
and development. Malviya ceased to be a minister in the mid-Sixties,
but the ONGC sprouted roots, so much so that within a couple of decades
one-third of the country’s total energy needs came to be met from the
fields it had developed. The IOC too enlarged its operations. With the
withdrawal of some private, mostly foreign, distributing agents, the
public sector in the distribution of oil got further enlarged. Another
public undertaking, the Gas Authority of India, soon joined them.





Nineteen
ninety-one changed all that. The ‘animal spirit’ of our entrepreneurs,
it was officially felt, needed to be given free rein in the energy
sector too. A new exploration and licensing policy was announced.
Licences for the exploration of development blocks were to be
auctioned. Private entities which won the auctions would have exclusive
rights to develop the blocks and sell the output. A National Hydro
Power Corporation was established to monitor these upstream activities,
including such things as determination of production cost and selling
price. Similarly, the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board was
constituted to oversee arrangements downstream, including issue of
franchise to selling agents. But, under the neo-liberal sky, the
regulatory arrangements went haywire. Everything was assumed to be fine
and excellent with private operators, the animal spirit tucked within
their souls must not be interfered with. And if some private parties
were particular pets of ruling politicians, all rules were apparently
rendered irrelevant. Transparency has been rubbed out. Few details are
available on the nature of the auctions of the development blocks, the
conditions under which licences were granted to particular parties, the
selling price that was settled, or royalty agreed to. In a parallel
manner, details regarding the price at which oil or natural gas was to
be disposed of downstream and the modalities for choosing agents have
been kept under the cloak. It has been a vast area of darkness.








It
is only on account of the happenstance of a domestic feud that some
grisly facts are suddenly out in the open. A family conglomerate was
allowed to establish a monopoly in both the production of natural gas
in a lush Deccan basin as well as in its distribution and further
processing downstream. It was a cosy fraternal arrangement between two
brothers, one sibling would handle affairs at the development end, the
other one would be sold the bulk of the output at a ludicrously low
price; whatever was left would be sold to public entities such as the
GAI and the National Thermal Power Corporation at inordinately high
prices. The prices the public sector units would be called upon to pay
would be determined on the basis of the claim of capital outlay posted
by the first brother amounting to as much as Rs 45,000 crore. The
comptroller and auditor general of India, ombudsman of the nation’s
public accounts, has not till now been allowed to audit this claim.
Both the NHPC and the PNGRB have gone into hibernation.





The
family, however, broke up. The two brothers turned into sworn enemies;
the brother at the production end reneged on the earlier understanding
to sell the bulk of the output to his sibling at an absurdly low price,
the aggrieved brother has now gone to court. The nation has thereby
learned how, in a neo-liberal regime, the country’s assets can be
deployed to serve exclusively the interests of a single family.





This
tale of two brothers illustrates how monopoly can be made easy. Joan
Robinson’s depiction of a process through which monopoly gets
established is not that essential. An entrepreneur need not prove
himself superior to his competitors in the battlefield of the market
before gaining the monopoly. A different route is possible. If you have
friends in the right political quarters, a monopoly will be gifted to
you on a platter.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090828/jsp/opinion/story_11415481.jsp







Resort ‘link’ arrested














Calcutta, Aug. 27: A
mid-level official of Vedic Village was arrested today for alleged
links with Gaffar Mollah, the wanted local tough whose capture could
blow the lid off a can of worms.





Biplab
Biswas, an assistant project manager in his mid-thirties, was taken
into custody after police called him over for questioning this
afternoon. Rahul Srivastava, the North 24-Parganas SP, said: “We
arrested him (Biswas) this afternoon.”





A
source in Vedic Realty, the promoters of Vedic Village, said Biswas had
joined the company around five years ago. As an assistant project
manager, he was in charge of land purchase and construction at the
resort site.





“We
have learnt about Biswas’s arrest today for his links with Gaffar. We
don’t have any further details,” said Raj K. Modi, the Vedic Realty
chairman and managing director.





Over
the past three days, the police have also questioned Modi, M.J.
Robertson, the CEO of Vedic Village, and Rajiv Bhuiyan, the estate
manager of the project.





“We
had questioned Biswas on Tuesday, too. Today, we summoned him again as
we had got information about his links with Gaffar,” said an officer.





Police
sources said Abdul Hai alias Kalobabu, a Gaffar aide arrested during
the day, “spilled the beans” on his leader’s alleged association with
Biswas.





“During
interrogation, Biswas broke down and admitted his links with Gaffar and
we arrested him. He also admitted his involvement with Gaffar in
forcefully acquiring land,” the officer said.





“Gaffar
is still at large but we think that with the arrest of Biswas, we have
moved closer towards catching him,” said a senior officer. The police
hope to make Gaffar sing on his connections once he is arrested.





Several
Rajarhat residents who had sold land for the Vedic Village project had
said Gaffar used to swing into action on the basis of information
provided by Biswas.





As
Biswas was dependent on Gaffar’s “Mastan Bahini” (army of toughs), he
had told other employees of Vedic Village not to bother Gaffar, police
sources said.





“Whenever land purchase





hit
a stumbling block, Gaffar’s services were sought… A couple of months
ago, Biswas had given 150 helmets and rods to Gaffar and his henchmen.
Those were stored inside Vedic Village,” said a 28-year-old youth who
works in the resort.





On
Monday, the police had found some helmets along with guns that the
management said had been left by goons who took shelter there from a
mob on Sunday.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1090828/jsp/frontpage/story_11419699.jsp

No comments: